How May They Use That Information
Contact me for thetravelnotes.com suggestions or questions! I reply to everyone.
Technological slavery
Introduction
Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has modified the world perpetually. Thanks to it, we can, for example, send info to the opposite end of the world in seconds; talk to individuals from other continents; travel to any place on the planet in one day; retailer hundreds of pictures on a drive the scale of your thumb; create virtual realities, in addition to do a bunch of other issues that nobody would have imagined simply 100 years ago.
But technology has its unhealthy side too. In the present world, it's managed by organizations who wouldn't have our greatest interests in thoughts. They will not hesitate to make use of expertise's great power towards us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the knowledge we obtain; emotional manipulation; modification of conduct - these are just some issues technology is being used for today. All that with more protection, accuracy, effectiveness and with less human effort. If this "progress" is just not stopped, we are going to find yourself in a prison that we would not discover in our worst nightmares.
I'll try to describe the best way crucial applied sciences of immediately contribute to the creation of a global system of control. I can even point out just a few technologies of the longer term, and try to attach all the information together and predict the destiny of this world. Let's start with one of many inventions that have an effect on individuals the most - The Internet.
The Internet
Every connection, for instance sending a message, or coming into an internet site, goes through your Internet Service Provider, earlier than it reaches the goal. In principle this means ISPs can freely spy on and modify everything you do on the web; for instance - decelerate or block the downloading of torrents; inject advertisements to your visited sites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-advertisement-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a massive censorship system, like the so-known as "Great Wall" of China.
The commonest usage of the Internet is browsing web sites, for which we use an online browser comparable to Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome. These three "giants" just about exist to collect knowledge on their users. Google at least admits to it - alternatively, Mozilla pretends to care about your freedom and privateness, but actually spies on you and controls you. It's been just a few years since Mozilla decided they may determine what add-ons you can and cannot install - apparently to "protect the customers", but nothing stops them from, for example, disabling AdBlock. Mozilla has labored with advertisers for a very long time - they've even shown them in your New Tab panel: https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-priceless-platform-for-advertisers-content material-publishers-and-customers/ (archive) (MozArchive). The myth of Firefox "respecting the user" has died and won't resurrect. Just learn a sure reply from their web site: Our merchandise don't interrupt the browsing expertise; they catch customers when they are most receptive to seeing new information. So, for them, you might be merely prey to be caught for the aim of getting ads be shoved into your mind. Despite that, they nonetheless spew slogans about "respect and freedom". I could spend the whole article on stating all the methods well-liked net browsers exploit you. Opera, for instance, literally spies in your whole web history without your information. The three giants talked about earlier additionally spy on you, but in another methods.
Almost each big webpage works carefully with the police / government and will happily share knowledge about you with them - for instance, the IP handle of the pc you made a forum post from. Exceptions, equivalent to Lavabit (fascinating story by the way in which - you can read it on the internet) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided.
Lately, it turned fashionable to store your knowledge "within the cloud", for example Dropbox or Google Drive. This is basically useful to the elites - they can now see and analyze your recordsdata, which can provide them information about your interests or plans (which could be used against you). One guy from 4chan was storing bomb making instructions on Dropbox, solely to seek out that, in the future, they've been deleted. The Internet is full of circumstances like that, and they don't seem to be all about bombs. Thus, we are able to see that your information isn't secure on these cloud "companies" - it ceases being yours. Probably, in a number of years, wanting to keep your data on your own drive can be thought of "abnormal" - and cloud storage shall be the usual - like it is in the present day with money vs bank accounts, for example. This can open the door to complete management of your saved information, mechanically blocking materials about - for instance - the aforementioned bombs. Another, possibly more plausible choice, would be punishing the individuals who upload such recordsdata - like movie producers did with people downloading certain torrents.
Google
How do most individuals discover data on the internet? Using Google, in fact. But Google is something more than just a search engine - it's a corporation whose intention is gathering as a lot information as attainable and creating a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for instance, google analytics) exist pretty much on each site - you possibly can even not know what Google is, but still be spied on. That information is then used to, for example, show you focused ads, but in addition different search results. So a Christian trying to find "abortion" will see one thing else than an atheist.
Google went additional and invented a brand new algorithm for displaying search results. The websites who are, in response to them, based mostly on "facts" will likely be greater up. However, those that contain untrue info (again, in line with them) can be further down. One of the ways Google charges the truth value of web sites is evaluating them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we understand how Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we can assume they'll pushed away by official versions of occasions. Soon, when we seek for something like "genetically modified organisms" we'll solely get "prepared" info. Google's invention could change into considered one of the most effective tools of censorship and opinion management.
Google also controls other common services. Considered one of the most popular is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they purchased it. I used to be surprised when a couple of years ago I couldn't log in to my YouTube account with out making a Gmail account. I didn't need their e-mail (which spies on you) so I mentioned goodbye to YouTube. I did not use it much, however still.
Another YouTube reform known as Content ID. It's supposed to protect copyright. The creator of a film or song can share their creation with Google, which can then compare it with each other file on YouTube. If it considers one of those recordsdata shut sufficient to the submission, it'll both delete that file, take away sound from it, or add commercials.
- Nintendo was able to put advertisements on some movies showcasing their games: http://www.destructoid.com/nintendo-is-claiming-possession-of-let-s-play-videos-253793.phtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A person uploaded some birds singing. Content ID assumed it was some copyright protected tune, and added advertisements to it, which earned the creator of the nonexistent song cash. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120227/00152917884/man-will get-bogus-youtube-copyright-declare-birds-singing-background.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- Some corporation even put advertisements on another person's track, and earned money from it: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/10513630347/umg-licenses-indie-artists-observe-then-makes use of-content material-id-to-claim-ownership-it.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)
Before Content ID was invented, someone who thought that a movie violates copyright, had to send YouTube a form, which could be accepted or not. As of late although, they've a a lot simpler manner referred to as Content ID, which permits them to earn cash if it finds some similarities. You possibly can theoretically attraction a Content ID decision, however it is pointless for the reason that enchantment shall be decided by...the same firm that uploaded the file. Many frustrated persons are complaining in internet comments, saying that Content ID is terrible, that it made a mistake with their movie, that they're stealing their cash, that they have misplaced their files or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI in general. Some people have said that movie or music creators needs to be glad to have their content material shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist solely as a result of Content ID occurred. Without it, folks could freely share their movies without them being probably modified / deleted by computerized evaluation.
An identical program might be used to delete movies about undesirable matters. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even when often that's just an excuse; however they must do it by hand. In the event that they put collectively Content ID with the positioning sorting algorithm, they might create a system that deletes certain content material routinely. A more advanced form of that algorithm might even delete sure components of movies which have undesirable topics (for instance, deleting a couple of second long part with a racist slur). It will work similar to the profanity filters on forums. But it surely would not be restricted solely to that - Google has proven, that they're very all in favour of controlling your beliefs, once they've created the site sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A device that would detect the place in your film an undesirable subject is talked about, and substitute it with their modified version, can be very welcome in their arsenal.
You may write an entire ebook about Google; I do not need to do it - but I need to briefly mention some other issues they've accomplished. Recaptcha is the most well-liked strategy to defend forums from spambots. When you wished to put in writing something on a forum with recaptcha, you had to kind a sure word. You didn't all the time get a phrase, although - you possibly can get something like a road address, which would then get added to Google StreetView, which allows spying on folks. For years, anybody who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with street addresses, whereas not essentially understanding about that. What really is StreetView? Google vehicles journey the world taking photos of all the things and everybody. Then they put these images of their database, which could be searched by anyone. Google has access to photos of the entire Earth, just about - and even to the history of locations individuals search for utilizing their maps. What could that information be used for? You can read on Wikipedia that a number of countries had an issue with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privacy. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to permit it. Isn't this evidence that we're dealing with a worldwide plan to spy on people?
They've modified ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of footage and you have to choose those containing a certain merchandise, for example hamburgers. This is used to practice Google's synthetic intelligence, which can even in all probability be used against us in the future. I will end this part with a quote from Google We do not want you to kind at all. We know where you might be. We all know where you've got been. We will roughly know what you're enthusiastic about.
Social networks
One in all the most popular internet sites lately are social networks, reminiscent of Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with info similar to name, surname, telephone number, place of work, interests, and pal lists. They don't have an issue with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it really easy, because the Like! button seems on hottest web sites, and clicking it sends info to Facebook in regards to the article you favored. How might they use that info? For instance, for displaying focused ads. Just a few years ago, Facebook promised that it could never try this - but then changed their thoughts and it is now a reality. Some of these ads might be insulting - for instance, a person suffering from cancer, after searching for details about it on the internet, was shown ads about...burial services! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privateness_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)
Comments written on these social networks are much more dangerous. They're connected to your real identify, and whoever finds your account can learn them. What could possibly be the consequences of that? You might lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:
- An individual was arrested for posting lyrics of a heavy metal track on Twitter. The government thought he was actually threatening to kill people and he was arrested. This incident was described in detail here: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140906/13490628443/heavy-metal-lyrics-posted-to-fb-outcome-arrest-terrorist-threats.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A waitress lost their job forty eight hours after complaining on Facebook that she's incomes too little in tips. http://www.inc.com/information/articles/2010/05/waitress-fired-for-facebook-submit.html (archive) (MozArchive)
We could be specializing in singular conditions - was someone punished appropriately or not? You possibly can even blame the sufferer. However the logical thing to do is to take a look at the entire concern from afar. If these comments have been made in individual, and never on the web, no one could have gotten in bother. The potential of punishing someone is the consequence of the technology that attaches the stuff you put up to your title. After years of utilizing social networks, you can find one thing on anyone, even if he did not suppose that the message he's writing would have given him issues later.
300 employers were requested whether or not they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an worker due to something he had in his profile. A number of the offending things have been: unfavorable opinions about previous employers, images of utilizing medicine or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" photographs.
There are additionally more direct ways that the social networks can affect you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to point out that you can control human minds with out figuring out them personally, and without their information. 689003 individuals (who weren't aware of being lab rats) have been divided into two teams - one in all them was proven solely content producing optimistic emotions, the other - solely negative. The extra positive content somebody noticed, the extra positively he himself responded. The variations had been small, however perhaps they could possibly be increased with more drastic measures. For instance, displaying someone articles about murders or kidnappings. You can additionally target the content material somebody was going to be proven individually - primarily based upon the things he's written in his profile, or his shopping historical past (which Facebook collects via the Like! buttons). If somebody reads loads of anti-authorities websites, they could be shown articles about the federal government doing something unhealthy. Or an anti-GMO individual can be proven details about GMOs being legalized somewhere. It is plausible that this experiment opened the door to only this kind of thing. You can read the entire experiment right here: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive)
Facebook additionally makes use of an algorithm for detecting faces on images and robotically including a reputation to them. http://www.dailydot.com/technology/fb-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). If your identify is on at least one picture, every different picture with your face might be detected as you.
Communication and encryption
Increasingly human communication is finished electronically. This has the same downside as financial institution accounts - you pay for a fundamental human want. But that is not an important. A human speaking eye to eye is spontaneous. He knows solely the particular person he's talking to can hear him. Then he brings that angle towards talking within the telephone, which follows totally different rules - all information about when, where, and to whom you made the call is saved in the supplier's database. In most nations the police has access to the data if they've the court docket order. But in Great Britain - the chief of electronic spying - three of four most used suppliers send all their knowledge to police in real time: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/computerized-police-entry-customers-cell-cellphone-information-like-money-machine-ripa-three-ee-vodafone/ (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are monumental - the same organization (the police) who can nice or punish you, now has access to all of your telephone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages earlier than, but normally they had to bodily search their telephones. This requirement disappears with the computerized system of sending messages to police.
The same is true of internet communication. Most people use frequent tools like Gmail or Skype. In one in every of his leaked paperwork, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program known as PRISM, with which these firms cooperate. Since 2011, Skype provides entry to your conversations to the NSA, including video recording:
After all, we may use much less popular software program with an encryption functionality, however would that protect us from spying?
David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, got here up with an concept to ban encryption, arguing that There should be no technique of communication, which we can not read. Many people laughed, saying that the federal government must delete encryption software from individuals's onerous drives (and would that actually be a problem for them? Malware exists, you recognize). Others thought that they cannot implement it, as a result of it will make banking and such insecure. But this appears to be like more like a desperate solution to dismiss the possibility that, within the near future, all our conversations executed electronically will likely be spied on by the federal government.
In one other leak of NSA's paperwork, it was proven that they need to cut back the effectiveness of widespread encryption:
You don't need to work with a software program's creator to spy on our conversations, though. Even in open supply software program (that anybody with enough data and dedication can examine), there nonetheless occur bugs that may weaken the encryption. For instance, OpenSSL, the preferred library encrypting our communications with web sites, for 1.5 years had a bug allowing to obtain a small amount of knowledge from the reminiscence of the server that it's used on, and that knowledge might embrace passwords and encryption keys. NSA, in fact, took benefit of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-mentioned-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-customers (archive) (MozArchive) Another instance: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anybody with enough functionality to decrypt communication made with it. And NSA has these capabilities - they also save all encrypted communications, so they can decrypt it later.
And they're going to almost definitely succeed - there is a large likelihood that quantum computers will make all present ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so personal conversations will probably be a thing of the past. Add to that voice recognition software, and we're discovering ourselves in a world where all our conversations are searched for certain phrases (by a program similar to Content ID I've talked about earlier).
Electronic banking
Cash payments are more and more usually being replaced by electronic ones. People just like the consolation of having the ability to order something they want and pay for it with a couple of clicks. Having a bank account is one thing normal nowadays, even required. But behind the curtain disguise gigantic implications for human privateness and freedom.
Let's begin from the basics - what's electronic money? It's a number in a database on a server belonging to the bank you're using. Your ability to purchase something depends on how huge that number is - and since humans have to, for example, eat - your life is dependent upon it. How a lot electronic cash you could have is dependent on plenty of things you cannot have an effect on - simply utilizing a checking account prices cash, so collaborating in this system means you routinely lose it.
A financial institution can eat much more of your cash - even with out taking into account hacking assaults like this: https://thehackernews.com/2016/05/swift-banking-hack.html (archive) (MozArchive), where the hackers stole 12 million dollars. One guy from Cyprus got 720 000 Euros stolen by the european fee to repay Cyprus' debt. He had to fireplace all his Cypriot employees and transfer to a different nation. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it altogether from his account. And, as he himself says, Thousands of different firms around Cyprus have the same situation. This exhibits how a lot you may rely on a quantity in a database - all it takes is one thought in someone's mind, and it is gone. Read more about this subject here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?matter=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)
Another drawback with digital payments is the fact that they're anti-privateness. All your transactions are saved within the financial institution's database. And the people controlling the bank can use it towards you - blocking unwanted transactions, such as shopping for bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit score-playing cards/naughty-issues-credit-card-wont-purchase-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It is easy to think about a world the place all of your transactions are analyzed and routinely blocked according to an inventory of banned items.
Paper cash doesn't have that problem. It is not going to disappear from your pocket. There is no central point that stores details about your transactions. You cannot "turn somebody off" if he pays with paper cash - if someone would not wish to promote you something, you go somewhere else. Paper money is a instrument of the free individual - that is why the elites are concentrating on it.
But you possibly can nonetheless use paper cash, proper? Maybe not for long - they've been trying to get individuals used to digital payments for a very long time. Advertising bank accounts is commonplace. More and more employers require having a checking account. The boundaries on the quantity you'll be able to spend without delay with paper cash are going down worldwide:
Will they go down to zero? In some places that is already the case; for example, buses in London cannot be paid for in money since three years in the past. The amount of cashless locations will increase, and people might be tied up within the digital internet of slavery.
2017 update: since writing the above, the situation has got a lot worse. In Sweden, funds are almost fully electronic: https://www.theguardian.com/enterprise/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-cards-telephone-apps-leading-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses have not taken cash for years, it is impossible to purchase a ticket on the Stockholm metro with money, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and avenue vendors - and even churches - more and more choose card or telephone funds.
In November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eradicated the two largest notes, which elevated the quantity of debit card payments by 108%. In the radio he said Less-money first, cashless society subsequent. There are a lot of other examples in several international locations, comparable to Denmark, the USA, and so forth. There's little question we're coping with a worldwide plan to destroy money.
CCTV cameras
The strongest weapon of the technological control system are positively the CCTV cameras. While you can mostly keep away from all the opposite things (a minimum of for now), the cameras are doing their job just by current. They have been slowly being put into varied places - from outlets and faculties to the streets, buses and flats; you possibly can assume that wherever you move, your life is being stored, watched and analyzed by strangers. I've recognized a spot where some drunks appreciated to fulfill up they usually put a digital camera in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the next day they changed it again, so it's clearly essential to them.
The existence of the spying system utterly adjustments the relations between people and the elites. You can't feel snug realizing that your each transfer is being spied on (by people who can even punish you when you do one thing they deem "mistaken"). Most individuals do not appear to care though - they purchase in outlets loaded with cameras and send their youngsters to schools which have cameras. Some are even completely satisfied that they are being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "security", or different excuses that have nothing to do with actuality. But that is simply the start - the effectiveness of the spying system will enhance so much that you won't be capable of reside the best way you at all times have. So what's the next part of this system?
Advanced cameras can do rather more than simply recording video and counting on the human's interpretation. They'll spy on a human as he goes from one digicam's range to another's, detect faces, mark people in line with gender or different criteria:
They may also detect your conduct and mark it as potentially "suspicious". This is already being used in places like India https://www.good.com/defending/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-Nice-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.good.com/defending/press-releases/Nice-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even in the Polish town Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)
This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There's a central level wherein the police can analyze all the info. One of many "suspicious behaviors" that have been being advertised by the CCTV corporations was taking out a pistol from your pocket. But something in any respect might be thought of "suspicious". Let us take a look at a few of the common issues that I've seen being banned: promoting stuff on the streets, feeding birds, carrying a mask, walking the dog (!), driving without seat belts, and so forth. Sometimes folks get fined for this stuff, but they should be discovered first. The intelligent monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites high-quality anyone for anything they imagine.
Imagine you're walking via an alley that is loaded with these cameras while consuming a sandwich. Then you throw away the bag through which the sandwich was. A camera sees that and assigns you a high quality of fifty dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the trail you're taking is now being watched and despatched to the police in real time. A few minutes later the police comes; you are making an attempt to hide but it is unattainable, since there are cameras in all places, and they know your position. In the end, you pay up, the same as anybody who has ever littered. This may look funny now, however the know-how exists to make this state of affairs a reality, it's only a matter of implementing it. The ads for these cameras make it clear - being in the crowd is not going to protect you. Neither will hiding your face, changing clothes, transferring somewhere, and so forth. People will for sure try to discover a way to idiot this system, and they may even succeed originally - however the algorithms will get better, and can finally make it inconceivable to idiot them.
Inventions of the future
There are other technologies, which have been lately invented, that sooner or later will gasoline the management system. Pretty much every new invention has the potential to do this (or even is invented for that reason), however I will attempt to describe an important ones.
Microchips
There may be a massive marketing campaign all over the world to put chips in folks's pets, allegedly to "be capable of finding them", but actually the point is to get individuals used to the thought of chipping. After which they will chip the folks. In some bars or workplaces they're already being used to, for example, open doors; after sufficient propaganda they will be injected in every little one that's born. They may replace ID playing cards, credit playing cards, and different present documents. They are going to be required in increasingly more locations, and you won't be capable of satisfy primary wants (akin to purchasing) without them. Why do the elites need to chip the people so bad? Because it would allow them to create a big database containing the time and place of each particular person. This has already been tried in some American colleges, for instance: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/children-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-expertise-faculties-use-track-the whole lot-children-do (archive) (MozArchive). The children put on ID cards on their necks, and those cards have the chips in them. Their place is being sent to the varsity computer systems in real time, in addition to detecting occasions corresponding to coming into or leaving faculty, shopping for lunch, or getting into the library. It's solely a matter of time till all of us have them under our skins.
Holograms
Advertisements have been with us for a long time, even before technology. You possibly can avoid them by putting in AdBlock or switching to another Tv channel. But you will not be able to cover from an advertisement displayed, for example, on grass or the sky. I thought that is far into the future earlier than I wrote this article, but truly, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-promoting-marketing campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive) This may be used not only to advertise products, however convince folks of the truth of a certain version of occasions.
Self-driving cars
Already being tested in, for example, California https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-vehicles-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they are going to lastly be put into roads, we are going to keep listening to about how safe they're (this already occurs, however shall be much more common). When people lastly get satisfied of the safety of those automobiles, regular cars might be banned since they're allegedly less safe than the computer-controlled ones. So we are going to be able to drive only in keeping with the path the computer chooses, which can in fact also be saved in the worldwide database. Cars with no steering wheel (already exist) will also stop fleeing from the police.
Culmination of the technological management system
The ultimate aim of the technological management system is placing together all these instruments to permit full management of humanity. To use the Internet, you'll have to provide your real title (or perhaps flash a microchip?) - so Everything we do there can be linked to our real person. All encrypted connections and conversations will probably be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents or even making jokes like "die in a fire" shall be a thing of the past. All the knowledge you receive might be controlled - just like what Facebook and Google already do, however globally.
Our physical place will likely be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which will likely be in locations similar to shops, airports, flats, and many others. So our movements will probably be analyzed in actual time - but not by people, like it's now, but by AI (and even robots, farther sooner or later). You will not be capable of flee from this system - they'll even spy on the homeless (there were already packages to search out and catalogue the homeless' place, allegedly to assist them, but it surely really was concerning the spying). Maybe they'll soon put cameras of their favorite places, if they are not already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they are already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/safety-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-population/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't suppose it would get there so fast!
Paper cash will absolutely disappear. All our transactions can be connected to our actual title, as every thing else. There shall be an enormous, worldwide database storing the physical position of each person, as well as every little thing he has ever accomplished, stated, wrote, purchased...All his movements will, of course, be analyzed in actual time by AI. I believe the expertise for all that already exists - so this can be a social or logistical downside, not a technological one. How long will it take the elites to put in all that, and get individuals used to slavery? I do not know. But one thing is for positive: the comfy life that you're used to, will probably be only a happy memory quickly.
Update 2022: one way or the other I felt like updating this, since I feel I failed to make my foremost level as effectively as I needed to. So, imagine a video sport character, like Mario. By interacting with the game, we will examine how excessive he can bounce, how long does it take him to achieve full running pace, what sorts of enemies he can stomp on and which he can't, and many others. Since Mario is only a program running on our computers / consoles, we will learn all that he can do at any second. His leap top is a relentless, so we are able to theoretically calculate whether he can hit some block, or in how a lot time (in-game frames) a certain enemy will attain us. More than that - by knowing the particulars of the sport, we can decide what's one of the best plan of action 5 levels down the road.
That is, actually, how extraordinarily precise speedruns are created. For easy games like Super Mario Bros, they are already very optimized, almost all the way down to a single step. But the same rules apply to even complex games like JRPGs. Picking up a sure item early on can help you do one thing 2 hours later. Learning a sure skill that's weak in the beginning can mean you can kill the ultimate boss in one hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a certain optimal value, etc. To a regular player, these methods might seem stupid within the brief time period, however they finalize in the best possible route in the long run. It isn't nearly speedruns, however any form of problem runs, etc. would require deep information and long run analysis of the sport mechanics to carry out.
Now what if I told you that actuality is the video game in query? Imagine - your location is already identified by your smartphone, or automotive, or a web of CCTV, or a mix of these. Your deepest darkest wishes are recognized by your search engines, your network of mates by the social media providers, etc. Just this alone enables large knowledge, prediction and management skills (this has been described within the earlier sections). But imagine we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, smart cities and stuff like that. With rising technology, we change into extra like the video recreation character.
To achieve that level, we require three things. First is the know-how that permits us precise sufficient knowledge collection. Second is highly effective computers that enable calculations fast enough to foretell outputs based on inputs lengthy ahead in time (what chess engines already do, however in a way more complicated system). The third is the expertise that allows us to push switches - the way a keyboard or joystick does in a video game machine. See, we're nonetheless bodily beings, dependent on things like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones entering a cell to trigger sure modifications, and so on. All of this might be theoretically controlled by expertise. Even now, with the relatively easy switches that now we have, we will already cause depression in social media users by showing them certain stories. We are able to get folks to purchase issues because of AI-decided direct commercials, and so forth. Imagine if we get right down to the extent of the cell!
And the elites are surely working on such a expertise as we communicate. I mean, what do you assume the mRNA vaccines are? Now I assume a few of this could possibly be used positively, but it one way or the other by no means is in the current world, so it's a idiot's dream. The main point is, we are going to lose our humanity either means, when the evaluation and management means reaches Mario's stage. We should both determine to inhibit such a technology, or give up our humanity, since e.g lying won't be attainable with neuron access. Hey, maybe you think that people will decide to give up superior technology. Forget about it, Ted Kaczynski has long disproved such a notion - expertise develops just about by itself, with out regard to human hopes and dreams.
And that is why we want the physical infrastructure quickly. If the world is managed by evil actors (because it is true now) and they have all this functionality (which we do not), together with direct cell access, God help us. The upper the expertise, the larger the facility difference between us and the elites. Resistance is not going to be potential anymore when know-how reaches such a stage (which I'd guess takes not more than a couple of decades). Imagine them being able to point out a graph of your almost certainly movements in accordance with the data they already have, in actual time, and use it towards you. How are you able to resist, when the computer systems can predict what you are going to do on Level 6 of the reality game - and push a switch to deny or change it? You won't ever do anything apart from what the elites (or the AI, whether it is given control and goes rogue) enable. And because the technological growth won't cease, we need to take over right now.